30 May 2025
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
   
  • Current Topics
  • Social Media
  • Innovation
  • Medical Education
  • Residency
  • Research
Headline News
  • Doctors Day 2020 – Anything But Happy 31 Mar 2020
  • Social Media and Professionalism – Protecting Your Patients, Your Profession, and You 30 Oct 2018
  • Reducing the Disclosure Effect in the Vitreoretinal Fellowship Match 24 Oct 2018
  • The Retina Society – 2018 Meeting Highlights 15 Sep 2018
  • Vitreoretinal Fellowship Match Survey – JAMA Ophthalmology 07 May 2018
  • home
  • blog
The Kings of Content: Why Academic Medicine Should Join Twitter

The Kings of Content: Why Academic Medicine Should Join Twitter

06 Jun 2015 eyesteve 1 5851

Introduction

Ever since I began residency I have been encouraging, prodding, and at times, persistently pestering department leadership of my belief that our ophthalmology department should have a dedicated Twitter feed. After months of persistence combined with good timing and supportive leadership, the Twitter feed was launched on June 1, 2015 for the University of Iowa Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, with the Twitter handle, @UIowaEye.

Let me explain why academic centers and departments should join Twitter

In recent years, the use of Twitter within medicine has increased significantly, and its uses are as varied as the persons and personalities who use it. For some physicians, Twitter is a method to connect with patients and for others, it provides an method to connect with and share research, insights, and anecdotes with professional colleagues worldwide. Furthermore, Twitter has become a powerful tool for the sharing of information at medical conferences via live-tweeting, and is even used in virtual journal clubs discussing new research or live twitter chats debating hot topics within healthcare.

In social media, just like in academia, content is king, and academicians are the Kings and Queens of high-quality content. One of the keys to success within social media (and within academics, research, branding, publishing) is to develop high-quality content. As Twitter users decide whether or not to follow a Twitter feed, the main question they ask themselves is, WHY should I follow you? What are you adding to my daily Twitter reading? You MUST offer high-quality as you seek to gain followers, and academic departments are consistently creating more high-quality content than they realize. Content is King, and when it comes to content, no one in medicine creates more high-quality, peer-reviewed, critically acclaimed content than academicians.

  • Research
    • Every year, faculty members of our ophthalmology department contribute to nearly 200 peer-reviewed journal articles. These articles represent months or often years of research efforts and sometimes undergo dozens of article revisions before they are submitted for publication. Once an article is published, its content has passed through the peer-review process, representing the most stringent tests of research quality and writing clarity. Each article is a masterpiece of its own, yet, once published, its readership is limited to a small subset of individuals who happen across the printed journal or whom are seeking that specific content via subsequent literature searches. Twitter provides an additional tool to reach a previously-unavailable online audience worldwide.
  • Medical Conferences
    • These meetings, attended by literally tens of thousands of physicians and researchers each year, are made up of content consumers and content contributors. The consumers are largely private practice physicians seeking to maintain their knowledge of new treatments and updates within their field. The contributors are those that are presenting posters, leading symposia, and participating in expert panels on hot topics in their specialty. To a large extent, the content contributors at academic meetings are the physicians and researchers within academic medicine, often discussing their innovative research and new ideas. These individuals are recognized thought leaders, and their insights are not only appreciated by conference participants, but by many others who can benefit from, learn, and utilize the information that can be shared at these conferences via Twitter.
  • Grand Rounds
    • These meetings, occurring in academic departments on a frequent basis, either daily, monthly, or quarterly, or at some other regularly scheduled interval, represent a mini medical conference within the academic department. The information shared at these meetings is usually limited only to those in attendance, yet the potential audience is much, much larger. In a recent survey at my institution, alumni identified our daily, morning rounds, wherein challenging cases and innovative research are discussed among faculty and residents, as one of the things they missed the most since completing their training and leaving the department to embark on new career opportunities. Grand Rounds represents yet another potential forum for academic departments to share content via social media and Twitter, as demonstrated in recent articles by Alex Djuricich and the Department of Pediatrics at Indiana University.
  • Alumni and Philanthropy
    • Academic medicine departments go to great lengths to maintain relationships with former residents and faculty. Quarterly or annual reviews, with research and clinical highlights from the department, are published in high-quality, high-glossy, high-expense publications sent to alumni to keep these alumni current on department news, maintain strong relationships with these referring providers, and enable the department to display/demonstrate/(show off) how cool they are when soliciting alumni for financial donations, scholarships, grants, and endowments. If the department is ALREADY going to the effort to create this content, why not share this information online via social media, reaching alumni who may not read the glossy magazine and potential philanthropic donors who may be drawn to the innovative and exciting news and updates from the department.
  • Patient Care
    • Academic medical centers are known for their status as a referral center for a large subset of patients, often with rare diseases, interesting clinical courses, and incredible stories. The stories from these patients are often shared via case-reports or department publications (with permission) to allow others to learn and be inspired by their story. Twitter can be used by these academic medical centers to further share these powerful stories with patients, physicians, and other interested-readers worldwide.

The @UIowaEye Prospective Study of Twitter in Academic Medicine

I would like to invite you to join me as I prospectively study how my academic ophthalmology department can use Twitter to further its mission. With the support of my faculty mentors and visionary leaders, I will be leading the Twitter team for the @UIowaEye twitter feed. I hope that through this study, we can demonstrate how an ophthalmology department can use Twitter to share content, connect with alumni, and highlight outstanding patient care. Join with me (follow @UIowaEye!) as we teach academic medicine what Twitter is all about.

 

Related

SHARE THIS ARTICLE :
Tweet

1 Comment

  1. Why Academic Medical Centers Should Be on Twitter. Right Now. | Wing of Zock | Reply

    […] posted June 6, […]

    00:00:39 , June 30th, 2015

We would love to hear what you think! Post your questions or comments below!Cancel reply

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

eyesteve
  • ABOUT ME
  • OTHER ARTICLES
Steve Christiansen, MD, is a vitreoretinal surgeon practicing in Colorado Springs, Colorado. He previously completed ophthalmology residency at the University of Iowa Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences in Iowa City, Iowa and fellowship at the Cincinnati Eye Institute in Cincinnati, Ohio.

Doctors Day 2020 – Anything But Happy

31 Mar 2020 eyesteve 1

Social Media and Professionalism – Protecting Your Patients, Your Profession, and You

30 Oct 2018 eyesteve 0

Reducing the Disclosure Effect in the Vitreoretinal Fellowship Match

24 Oct 2018 eyesteve 0

The Retina Society – 2018 Meeting Highlights

15 Sep 2018 eyesteve 2
PREVIOUS

What A Child With Cancer Taught His Doctor About Superheroes

NEXT

ARVO 2015 Twitter Highlights

RELATED POST

Doctors Day 2020 – Anything But Happy

31 Mar 2020 eyesteve 1

Social Media and Professionalism – Protecting Your Patients, Your Profession, and You

30 Oct 2018 eyesteve 0

Reducing the Disclosure Effect in the Vitreoretinal Fellowship Match

24 Oct 2018 eyesteve 0

The Retina Society – 2018 Meeting Highlights

15 Sep 2018 eyesteve 2

FIND EYESTEVE ON SOCIAL MEDIA

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Subscribe to EyeSteve

Latest Posts

Doctors Day 2020 – Anything But Happy

31 Mar 2020 eyesteve 11323

Social Media and Professionalism – Protecting Your Patients, Your Profession, and You

30 Oct 2018 eyesteve 8721

Reducing the Disclosure Effect in the Vitreoretinal Fellowship Match

24 Oct 2018 eyesteve 8252

Latest Tweets From EyeSteve MD

Follow @eyesteve

EyeSteve.com Logo

EyeSteve.com was created to educate, inform, and inspire all things eye by discussing various aspects of medical education, informing patients about eye diseases and innovative new treatments, and inspiring us all toward vision health and appreciation of the wonderful gift of sight.

Recent Posts

  • Doctors Day 2020 – Anything But Happy
  • Social Media and Professionalism – Protecting Your Patients, Your Profession, and You
  • Reducing the Disclosure Effect in the Vitreoretinal Fellowship Match
  • The Retina Society – 2018 Meeting Highlights
  • Vitreoretinal Fellowship Match Survey – JAMA Ophthalmology

Get EyeSteve In Your Email

Subscribe to eyesteve.com and receive notifications of new posts instantly by email.

Follow @eyesteve
View Steven M. Christiansen's profile on LinkedIn
Copyright 2014 | eyesteve.com | All Rights Reserved | Powered by WordPress